A Research Guide for Students by I Lee

Translate this page to another language of your choice:


To translate a block of text or web page, click Bing Translate or Google Translate


Wall Street Executive Library Feature Site- Link to a world of resources.
Reference  Sitmap
     
Google
site search by freefind
     
Bookmark/Share

Loss of Resources
for Our Canadian Medicare

By Dr. Peter W. Kujtan, B.Sc., M.D., Ph.D.

Article printed on page 27 in the May 26, 2010 issue of
The Mississauga News under the feature: Health & Beauty, Medicine Matters.
Portrait of Dr. Peter W. Kujtan, supplied 2005
Dr. Peter W. Kujtan

You probably have been reading about changes in the United States health system by President Obama. After 40 years of observing the great Canadian social Medicare experiment, the Americans are getting the message that a nation's health can be measured by the universality of healthcare services.

The greatest attractiveness of the American healthcare system is restricted to those with financial resources. A thick wallet produces quick access and treatment with no wait.

In Canada, it doesn't matter whether you drink Timmy's or Starbucks, you're still in the same line. There are millions of Americans who would welcome the chance to stand in one of our free health care lines.

In Ontario, we have one large insurer called OHIP which is run by the government for all the people, and small private companies that fill in various gaps. The U.S. system is dotted with numerous private insurers who pick and choose (and more importantly decide) who and what your treatment options are. The bureaucracy is as tremendous as the bureaucrats are numerous.

Stockholders do well in this system, but Canadians still tend to be healthier than our American cousins. We silently accept an increasing shortage of physicians, tend to patiently wait for services, say please and occasionally thank you. Life threatening illnesses are routinely put to the front of the line with understanding by most.

We have done very little to build the required infrastructure to educate the generations of physicians we are short of in this country. The shortage has produced a largely hidden brain drain.

Our capacity to train physicians is limited and few politicians will invest in a traditional solution that will not see a return for a decade. We invest heavily in pre-medical education to produce 12 equally qualified candidates for every scarce medical school spot. That represents a whopping 92% loss on our investment.

Over the last few years, the Americans, British and Irish have ramped up their medical schools and maintained high standards and taken our "losses." They convince students to pay for their own medical education, and graduate them into their own systems by the hundreds.

Instead of attracting these Canadian doctors back home to our shortage, we brand them as foreigners, and spend time arguing about which country is best to pilfer and retrain doctors from.

With primary care reform, President Obama hopes to replace thousands of administrators and red tape workers with front line nurses and doctors, but let's consider some sobering thoughts: It is estimated that the U.S. system will need at least 20,000 extra doctors to accomplish this. If we tapped this silent brain drain of Canadians, it is estimated that we could have adequate medical manpower within five years. It would require no expensive infrastructure. Better yet, we could take the bull by the horn and pay for our students to train in qualified schools with the provision that they practice in Canada. Just thinking outside the box, this strategy could save billions and turn some of that 92% loss into a gain.

What future awaits a country that pays heavily to educate its citizens, and then willingly, freely gives away this valuable resource?

The American population is graying as fast as we are, and happily welcome our intellectual cast-offs, since Canadians look, speak and dress similar to Americans. Not only are we wasting a valuable national resource, it amounts to a national shame!


Related resources:

How Bad Is the Brain Drain? by Charlotte Gray, Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ) contributing editor. "The brain drain south was particularly dramatic in the mid-1990s ... In 1996, ... 731 physicians left Canada. Although another 218 doctors returned, the net loss was 513 physicians - a number roughly equivalent to 30% of the annual output from Canada's 16 medical schools."

McGill downplays medical brain drain by The Gazette (Montreal), 11 Apr. 2007. "McGill University trained almost one in every four Canadian-schooled doctors currently working in the United States - even though the Montreal institution produces only about one of every 15 Canadian medical graduates."

Canada named a culprit in China's brain drain by CanWest News Service, 4 Mar. 2007. "The Chinese government has raised an alert about a severe brain drain and has listed Canada among the top recipients of its exported talent."

Global medical ethics: Adding insult to injury: the healthcare brain drain by Dr C R Hooper, Philosophy Department, University College London, London, UK. Journal of Medical Ethics, 16 Jan. 2008.

Canada's brain drain trend reverses for doctors: report Canadian Press, 12 Oct. 2006.

The Metrics of the Physician Brain Drain by Fitzhugh Mullan, M.D.

HOME         Other Articles by Dr. Kujtan